A small sword - placed among several medieval items in a display cabinet - was accidentally found by Vittoria Dall’Armellina, a Ph.D. student at the University Ca' Foscari in Venice.
The sword traveled from Trebizond to Venice in the second half of the 19th century, a gift from Yervant Khorasandjian, an art dealer and collector. source
According to Dall’Armellina, the weapon she had spotted didn’t look like a medieval artifact, but a much older sword, similar to those she had already met in her studies.
The sword did, in fact, look very similar to those found in the Royal Palace of Arslantepe (Eastern Anatolia), dating back to five thousand years ago and considered to be the oldest swords in the world. The name of Arslantepe is derived from the lion (“Arslan” in Turkish) statues excavated at the location.
Arslantepe - an important Hittite settlement during all ages of the Hittite period and later became a major site as a Neo-Hittite city-state - was even inhabited much earlier since the Chalcolithic Age. The area was also a residential area for the Romans until the 5th to 6th centuries A.D. and used as a necropolis by the Byzantines until the 11th century.
As to the latest discovery of the Anatolian sword, the same type of sword - coming from the Sivas region - was also found inside the Tokat Museum (Turkey). Indeed, this weapon shows quite a few similarities with the San Lazzaro one.
After confirming that the sword had never been recorded in the catalog of Near East antique objects belonging to the Saint Lazarus Island museum and having received the approval of her Ph.D. supervisor Elena Rova, professor of Archeology at the Department of Humanities, Dall’Armellina carried forward with the investigation to assess whether her intuition was correct and in doing so, she managed to shed light on many puzzling aspects of the discovery.
Father Serafino and Ph.D. student Vittoria Dall'Armellina, in a monastery on the island of San Lazzaro degli Armeni in the Lagoon City. Image: Andrea Avezzù - Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
The scientific analysis confirmed her suspects: the sword doesn’t just resemble the most ancient weapons in the world, but it was also forged around the same time, around the year 3000 b.C.
An Anatolian weapon casually reappears in Venice, resurfacing from the darkness that engulfed it for millennia.
How did it come to the monastery and what could have been its ties with the Armenian monks?
Who did it belong to and which far away lands had he explored?
Who wielded the weapon? Or was somebody buried with it?
Ansa.it reports that "the research was carried out by consulting Father Serafino Jamourlian, of the mekhitarist monastery of San Lazzaro, who was able to partly solve the question by consulting the archives of the museum.
The sword arrived from Trabzon to Venice, donated by an art merchant and collector, Yervant Khorasandjian, in the mid-1800s, according to an envelope. It was found with other objects in an area called Kavak. Ghevond Alishan, a famous poet, and writer who was friends with John Ruskin, a monk with the congregation and a researcher, died in Venice in 1901. It is thought, therefore, that this episode dates back to the last decades of the 19th century."
The sword is made of a type of copper and tin frequently used before the Bronze age, according to the analysis on the metal's composition has been carried out in collaboration with Professor Ivana Angelini and (Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca Studio e Conservazione dei Beni Archeologici, Architettonici e Storico-Artistici) Ciba at the University of Padua.
The Saint Lazarus Island sword shows the strong resemblance to the twin swords of Arslantepe, retrieved in a well-documented context, have allowed the experts to determine that the sword dates back to around the end of 4th and the beginning of the 3rd-century BC., as well as confirming its affinity to a
This type of sword was common in a relatively small region in Eastern Anatolia, between the high course of the Euphrat and the Southern shore of the Black Sea. The sword, contrary to some of the Arslantepe specimens, is not decorated: there are no visible inscriptions, embellishments or distinctive features. Due to the less than optimal conservation conditions, it was not possible to detect any traces of usage.
Consequently, the sword could have been a real offensive weapon that was actually used in combat, a ceremonial sword or part of some grave goods.
A likely hypothesis is that it was part of a burial -casually retrieved by some local townsfolk - whose grave goods were then scattered, as it often happened until a few years ago.
Indeed, the sword was forged during a period of time in which Anatolian and Caucasian burials began to be adorned with a rich array of grave goods, with weapons and jewels, a sign of the emergence of a new warrior elite.
The sword’s real story is still unknown; the researchers hope to shed some light on the artifact's distant past.
Written by Jan Bartek - AncientPages.com Staff Writer
Expand for references